An overview of authors from Saint Paul

By: Karl Salkowski

(Image Credit Unsplash)

There are a number of very influential and well regarded authors who are affiliated with Saint Paul, Minnesota. Many of the stories they wrote were based on life growing up in Minnesota and the communities they were a part of. F. Scott Fitzgerald is probably the most famous author from the Saint Paul area, but there are many others including modern authors such as Kao Kaila Yang and William Kent Krueger.  

F. Scott Fitzgerald was born on Summit Avenue in 1896, just a few miles away from Highland Park Senior High school. He is most well known for his novels about the “jazz age.” His most successful work ‘The Great Gatsby’ is still relevant in the modern era over a hundred years after its publication, and is still frequently taught in high schools across the United States. I personally would recommend ‘The Great Gatsby’, because I really enjoyed the way the story and characters’ relationships unfolded.

August Wilson, a Pulitzer Prize winning playwright, lived in Minnesota for over a decade. He has had a long association with the local Penumbra Theater Company located in Saint Paul. His most famous plays are ‘Fences’ and ‘The Piano Lesson’. He is known for writing about the African American experience growing up throughout the 20th century. Three of his plays have already been adapted into films.

Another famous writer, Garrison Keillor, spent much of his career living in Saint Paul, producing the MPR variety show ‘A Prairie Home Companion’ and several books. He is best known for making fun of the “Minnesotan Sensibility”, through his “News from Lake Wobegon,” where “all the children are above average.”

William Kent Krueger is a crime writer who lives in Saint Paul, famously known for having won back-to-back Anthony Awards for best novel. When the Saint Clair Broiler was still in operation, locals would often see him there writing. 

Kao Kaila Yang is one of the most influential contemporary writers in Saint Paul. She is a Hmong refugee and has often written about the refugee experience, and her own family’s story. She writes for all ages, everything from picture books to memoirs. Her most famous work is ‘The Latehomecomer: A Hmong Family Memoir’, which has won several prestigious awards and is highly rated on both Goodreads and Amazon.

Best scorers in NBA history and why

By: Ro’Mel Bryant-Oliveraz

Photo by Emmanuel Newton on Pexels.com

Being the best scorer in NBA history isn’t just about total points or averages. It’s also about who is the biggest threat every time they touch the ball and can score in the most ways. NBA legends like Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Kevin Durant, Steph Curry, and even modern players like Luka Doncic all redefined scoring through skill, technique, and IQ.

Michael Jordan is always seen as the gold standard for many. As a pure scorer, he combined unmatched athleticism, an almost undefendable drive, and one of the best mid range shots. Opponents had to guard every part of the floor because Jordan could jump above defenders or fade away under pressure. He has the record of 10 scoring titles, heavily adding to his scoring reputation.

Kobe Bryant is also one of the best behind MJ, taking Jordan’s blueprint and adding his own pre planned footwork and bag of fakes. With a very fast release and the ability to spin into layups or pull-up jumpers, and ability to fake them, Kobe made every possession a calculated threat of scoring. He has the record of third most points scored in a game at 81 points.

LeBron James brings unmatched physical dominance and longevity. The all-time leading scorer has averaged around 25+ points for over 20 years. His size, speed, strength, and evolving shooting make him almost unstoppable in transition and the half court.

Kevin Durant is the ultimate scoring machine. At 7 feet with movement and handles like a small guard, and a pure shooting stroke, KD can score from anywhere at all; pull up threes, mid range, or over smaller defenders at the rim. His length makes his shot almost unblockable, while also refining his shooting to be one of the most pure, effortless, and automatic. He is a 4-time NBA scoring Champion, and a prominent member of the 50-40-90 club, meaning at least 50% from field, 40% from three, and 90% from the line.

Steph Curry changed the game with his unlimited shooting range and off ball movement. He forces defenses to guard 30 feet or more from the basket, creating space for himself and teammates, and being able to shoot impossible shots from impossible distances. He also has one of the best handles and body manipulation for a small guard. He holds the record of career made 3 pointers, and is the only player to record a 50-40-90 season while leading the league in scoring. He also has a 42.3% shooting from deep, which is unheard of, and more importantly the only player to have a Unanimous MVP.

Today, Luka Doncic uses top tier rhythm manipulation to make his movement slow yet unpredictable. Also being able to score from anywhere on the court from deep threes, mid range fade aways, or tough layups. Combine that with elite playmaking and willingness to take tough shots, makes him one of the most offensively best players. He has the highest scoring averages in NBA history, and second highest career playoff PPG behind Jordan.

Overall, the greatest scorers are those who force defenses to change strategy. Jordan, Kobe, LeBron, KD, Curry, and Luka, each proved scoring is about skill, versatility, achievements and mentality; not just points.

Sports schedule for: Apr 20-25

 ATHLETIC EVENTS SCHEDULE APRIL 20 – APRIL 25
MONDAYAPRIL 20 
TIMEBUS TIMESEVENTLOCATION
1:00pm Varsity Girls Golf TournamentHighland 9
2:30pm JV Girls Golf MatchCedarholm Golf Course
3:30pm2:45pm | 6:45pmJV Boys Golf MatchComo Park Golf Course
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:00pm Boys Tennis vs. JohnsonV: Eastview Park JV: HOME
V: 4:30pm JV: 4:30pm Baseball vs. RooseveltV: Neiman Field #2 JV: HOME
TUESDAYAPRIL 21  
TIMEBUS TIMESEVENTLOCATION
11:20am 3:30pm Boys Golf vs. Forest Lake Boys Golf vs. CentralTanners Brook GC Highland National GC
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:00pm Badminton vs. Washington TechHOME
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:30pmTBDBaseball vs. EdisonNortheast Athletic Field
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:00pm Boys Tennis vs. Minnehaha AcademyV: Minnehaha Academy JV: HOME
V: 4:30pm Varsity Softball vs. Minnehaha-SPASt. Paul Academy
B: 4:30pm JV: 4:30pm V: 6:00pm3:15pm | 7:00pmBoys Volleyball vs. Washington TechWashington Tech
7:00pm Boys Lacrosse vs. SPATwo Rivers High School
WEDNESDAYAPRIL 22  
TIMEBUS TIMESEVENTLOCATION
JV: 2:00pm V: 3:30pm JV Boys Golf Conference  Match Varsity Boys Golf vs. HardingJV: Highland 9 V: Phalen Golf Course
3:30pm JV Girls Golf MatchCedarholm Golf Course
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:00pm Badminton vs. Eden PrairieHOME
V: 4:00pm JV: after varsity Softball vs. St. Croix LutheranSt. Croix Lutheran Academy
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:00pm Boys Tennis vs. HumboldtV: Humboldt High School JV: HOME
THURSDAYAPRIL 23  
TIMEBUS TIMESEVENTLOCATION
V: 1:00pm JV: 2:00pm1:00pm | 6:00pmBoys Golf vs. TartanOak Marsh Golf Course
2:50pm Girls Golf vs. HardingPhalen Golf Course
V: 4:00pm JV: 4:00pm3:15pm | 5:00pmBadminton vs. HumboldtHumboldt High School
4:00pm Track and Field vs. Johnson and CentralHOME
JV: 4:30pm V: 6:00pmV: 4:45pm | 8:00pmBaseball vs. Nova Classical-TCAJV: HOME V: Neiman Sports Complex
JV: 4:30pm JV Softball vs. Minnehaha-SPASt. Paul Academy
B: 5:00pm JV: 5:00pm V: 6:30pm Boys Volleyball vs. HumboldtHOME
JV: 5:30pm V: 7:00pm Girls Lacrosse vs. Apple ValleyTwo Rivers High School
FRIDAYAPRIL 24  
TIMEBUS TIMESEVENTLOCATION
JV: 4:00pm V: 6:00pm Girls Lacrosse vs. HastingsCentral High School
V: 3:45pm JV: 3:45pm Boys Tennis vs. Cretin-Derham HallV: Cretin-Derham Hall JV: HOME
4:00pm Varsity Softball Tournament vs. DeLaSalleHOME
V: 4:30pm JV: 4:30pmV: 3:15pm | 6:30pmBaseball vs. HardingV: Harding High School JV: HOME
5:00pm Track and Field: Hamline Elite MeetHamline University
JV: 5:30pm V: 7:00pm Boys Lacrosse vs. HastingsHastings High School
SATURDAYAPRIL 25  
TIMEBUS TIMESEVENTLOCATION
10:00am8:15am | 4:00pm 2 busesTrack and Field: Lakeville Mega MeetLakeville North High School
Game 2: 11:00am Game 3: 1:00pm Varsity Softball Tournament vs. St. Agnes and Minneapolis SouthwestHOME

What to expect from World Cup 2026

By: Ikraam Abdalla

Copyright-free version of the 2026 world cup logo, 3 March 2026 By: Wikidasher

You have probably heard of one of the most, if not, the most popular sporting event in the entire world, the FIFA World Cup. Hosted every 4 years, this huge battle happens amongst national teams to determine the world’s soccer champion. What’s special about this year is that the World Cup will be hosted in the USA, Mexico and Canada.

For the first time since 1998, 48 teams will be participating instead of just 32, bringing a new record of 104 matches to be played. 

This World Cup will have a lot of familiar faces such as England, France, Brazil, Spain and Argentina but also expect to see new countries that will be making their debut such as Uzbekistan, Jordan and Cabo Verde.

There will be a total 16 host cities, including Mexico City, Toronto, Vancouver, Atlanta, Houston, NYC and many more. The first game will be played on June 11, 2026 with Mexico vs South Africa held at Estadio Azteca Stadium in Mexico City. The last game (the finals) will be played on July 19, 2026 at MetLife stadium in New Jersey. 

Despite the excitement from soccer fans around the world, there is a lot of fear regarding US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) being present. Unfortunately, the US government has deported more than 500,000 people from the USA in 2025. This has led to widespread fear across the country which is harmful to the well-being of people in the US but also people traveling to the US. FIFA has said they are committed to working with all the hosting cities to meet human rights goals and ensure that the tournament operations are respectful of people.

But this whole impact goes beyond the World Cup as it instills fear for people everywhere and naturally so.

Ultimately, the FIFA World Cup 2026 should unite countries all around the globe. Especially in this time, the World Cup should be a celebration amongst communities, free from danger and discrimination. FIFA should take action to protect its players and supporters as they are the ones who are joining together as one for the game of soccer.

For more information, please visit:

D1 NCAA wrestling championships results and reactions

By: Brayden Marsh and Dahlia Man

125lbs:

The champion of this bracket was expected by many fans, however the other places were not predicted by many fans. In the semifinals, Luke Lilledahl of Penn State beat Troy Spratley from Oklahoma State by decision 8-3, and on the other side of the bracket, Marc-Anthony McGowan from Princeton University beat Jacob Moran from Indiana University. In the finals, Luke Lilledahl beat Marc-Anthony McGowan by decision 2-1.

Many fans had predicted Luke Lilledahl to win, but the other places were up for debate. Nico Provo from Stanford placed 3rd, Vincent Robinson from NC State placed 4th, Troy Spratley from Oklahoma State placed 5th, Jacob Moran from Indiana University placed 6th, Jore Volk from University of Minnesota placed 7th, and Tyler Klinsky of Rider University placed 8th.

133lbs:

133 was arguably the hardest bracket this year. Ben Davino of Ohio State beat Marcus Blaze of Penn State in a tiebreaker 3-2, and Jax Forrest of Oklahoma state beat Aaron Seidel of Virginia Tech by major decision 14-3. In the finals, Jax Forrest beat Ben Davino by decision 4-2.

The other places were Aaron Seidel of Virginia Tech at 3rd, Marcus Blaze of Penn State at 4th, Drake Ayala from the University of Iowa at 5th, Tyler Knox of Stanford University at 6th, Jacob Van Dee from University of Nebraska at 7th, and Lucas Byrd from the University of Illinois at 8th.

141lbs:

This bracket’s top 3 had been predicted by many fans, however the champion many chose had not prevailed. In the semifinals, Jesse Mendez of Ohio State beat Luke Stanich of Lehigh University during overtime 4-1. On the other side of the bracket, Sergio Vega of Oklahoma State beat Brock Hardy from the University of Nebraska by decision 5-3, which many fans had not predicted. In the finals, Sergio Vega had a surprising victory over Jesse Mendez in overtime 4-1, making Sergio Vega the champion.

Other places are Luke Stanich of Lehigh University at 3rd, Brock Hardy of the University of Nebraska at 4th, Carter Nogle of the Airforce Academy at 5th, Anthony Echemendia from Iowa State University at 6th, CJ Composto of the University of Pennsylvania at 7th, and Wyatt Henderson of Lock Haven University at 8th.

149lbs:

This weight went basically as expected. In the semis, Shayne Van Ness from Penn State beat Chance Lamer from University of Nebraska by tech 22-1, and Aden Valencia of Stanford University beat Lachlan McNeil from the University of Michigan by decision 9-5. In the finals, Aden Valencia beat Shayne Van Ness by decision 8-5.

Other places were Lachlan McNeil from University of Michigan at 3rd, Chance Lamer from the University of Nebraska at 4th, Collin Gaj of Virginia Tech at 5th, Ryder Block from the University of Iowa at 6th, Cross Wasilewski from the University of Pennsylvania at 7th, and Casey Swiderski of Oklahoma State at 8th.

157lbs:

This bracket did not go as expected for many fans this year. By the semifinals, there were 2 freshmen, PJ Duke from Penn State and Landon Robideau from Oklahoma State; a sophomore, Ty Watters from West Virginia University; and a junior, Antrell Taylor from the University of Nebraska. Antrell Taylor also happened to be last year’s champion. During the semi finals, Taylor and Watters have a very close match resulting in Taylor winning 4-2, and on the other hand Duke and Robideau also had a very close match, which resulted in Robideau winning in a tiebreaker. This win was very controversial to fans because of a takedown call to Duke that was later revoked after reviewing the footage. The finals were another very close match between Robideau and Taylor, with Robideau winning 4-2.

The other places were PJ Duke from Penn State at 3rd, Brandon Cannon from Ohio State at 4th, Kannon Webster from University of Illinois at 5th, Ty Watters from West Virginia University at 6th, Cameron Catrabone from the University of Michigan at 7th, and Meyer Shapiro from Cornell University at 8th.

165lbs:

These matches went as expected by fans. Michael Caliendo from University of Iowa won by fall against Thomas Snipes from California Institute of Technology, then won by tech fall against Noah Mulvaney from Bucknell University 20-5, he won by major decision against EJ Parco from Stanford University 14-3, and then went into overtime with Joey Blade from Purdue University, but won 8-5. On the other side of the bracket, Mitchell Mesenbrink from Penn State tech fell Cody Walsh of Drexel University 21-5, won by major decision against Paddy Gallagher from Ohio State 12-0, won by decision against Bryce Hepner of the University of North Carolina 6-0, and tech fell Cesar Alvan from Columbia College. In the finals, Mesenbrink tech fell Caliendo 20-4. This came with little surprise however, since Mesenbrink had already wrestled Caliendo 8 times, and went undefeated.

Other places were Cesar Alvan from Columbia College at 3rd, Nicco Ruiz from Arizona State University at 4th, Andrew Sparks from University of Minnesota at 5th, Joey Blaze of Purdue University at 6th, Bryce Hepner of University of North Carolina at 7th, and Paddy Gallagher from Ohio State at 8th.

174lbs:

This weight class was also predicted correctly by many fans. In the semis, Levi Haines of Penn State beat Patrick Kennedy from the University of Iowa by tech 18-3, and Christopher Minto from the University of Nebraska beat Cam Steed from the University of Missouri by decision 5-1. In the finals, Levi Haines beat Christopher Minto by decision 2-0.

Other places include Patrick Kennedy from the University of Iowa at 3rd, Carson Kharchla from Ohio State at 4th, Cam Steed from the University of Missouri at 5th, Dany Wask from the Naval Academy at 6th, Beau Mantanona from the University of Michigan at 7th, and MJ Gaitan from Iowa State at 8th.

184lbs:

Like many of the other brackets, these were very close matches. In the semifinals, Rocco Welsh of Penn State beat Brock Mantanona from the University of Michigan by decision 4-3, and Max McEnelly beat Angelo Ferrari from the University of Iowa in a tiebreaker 3-2. In the finals, Max McEnelly has a very close match with Rocco Welsh, but won by decision 4-3.

Other places are Aeoden Sinclair from the University of Missouri at 3rd, Caleb Campos of American University at 4th, Brock Mantanona from the University of Michigan at 5th, Angelo Ferrari from University of Iowa at 6th, Eddie Neitenbach from the University of Wyoming at 7th, and Zack Ryder of Oklahoma State at 8th.

197lbs:

These matches also went how people predicted them. In the semis, Josh Barr of Penn State beat Joey Novak from the University of Wyoming by major decision 14-3, and Cody Merrill of Oklahoma State beat Stephen Little of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock in a tiebreaker 3-2. In the finals, Josh Barr beat Cody Merrill by decision 6-3.

Other places include Stephen Little from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock at 3rd, Joey Novak from the University of Wyoming at 4th, Angelo Posada from Stanford University at 5th, Camden McDanel of the University of Nebraska at 6th, Gabe Arnold from the University of Iowa at 7th, and Branson John from the University of Maryland at 8th.

285lbs

Up until the semifinals, everything went pretty much as expected, however fans were split on who would be the champion from here. Isaac Trumble from NC State won against Taye Ghadiali from University of Michigan by decision 4-1, and Yonger Bastida from Iowa State won by major decision over AJ Ferrari from University of Nebraska 15-7. In the finals, Isaac Trumble won by decision over Yonger Bastida by decision 5-0. This outcome was predicted by some fans, but others may have predicted AJ Ferrari or Yonger Bastida winning.

Other places were Taye Ghadiali from University of Michigan at 3rd, Konner Doucet from Oklahoma State at 4th, Ben Kueter from the University of Iowa at 5th, AJ Ferrari from the University of Nebraska at 6th, David Szuba from Arizona State University at 7th, and Christian Carroll of the University of Wyoming at 8th.

Psychology behind why people prefer cats or dogs

By: Ro’Mel Bryant-Oliveraz

Photo by Helena Jankoviu010dovu00e1 Kovu00e1u010dovu00e1 on Pexels.com

People usually pick a side, cats or dogs, but not everyone questions why they really feel that way. They might think they just prefer dogs because they are more energetic and loyal, or cats because they can just do their own thing while still being present. Of course, they may also choose which, based on lifestyle, maybe they need a cat because they want company without too much work, or a dog because they want to be outside more. Or maybe they just got one as a child and that became their favorite for life. But what does the psychology behind those choices say; what does that say about your preferences?

For dogs their life revolves around their owner. They want to be with their owner all the time, their food depends on the owner, their hygiene, and meaningful fun. If you prefer a dog you want something similar to a baby, someone you can always be around, and have fun with, for the most part. Dogs are simple minded, think about the immediate, and the main thing on their mind is you. They just want to have fun, eat good food, and be around you.

Cats on the other hand are much more independent. They depend on you for their food, and to clean up their areas. They don’t need fun stimulation like dogs; their stimulation is more about hunting exercises, which don’t require humans. They clean themselves well enough without needing humans. They mostly just prefer your company, but don’t need it. If having a dog is like a baby, having a cat is like having a younger sibling. When they play with human hands or anything, their reflexes are too fast to get hit by a human, they just let it happen for fun. That’s how cats usually interact with humans, it’s mostly for the human’s sake, they also want you to have fun; not just themselves. Cats even developed meowing for communication to humans; they don’t really for each other, except kittens.

Preferring a cat is like preferring an independent pet that you interact with out of mutual interest, mutual benefit. The cat sees you as someone who gives them food and is in charge of the space they live in, so they want to interact with you a little bit, but they are independent and can get most of their necessities alone.

Preferring a dog is like preferring a pet that constantly wants to be with you, it thinks everything that it would want would come from you, and that you are the best. Dogs think about the moment, like food, fun, and blind curiosity. They depend on you for responsible things like eating healthy food, hygiene, and a place to sleep. And they love that fact.

Spring break

By: Merob Geleto

Helenium “Fancy Fan” in Val-Dieu. 23 June 2020, by:
Horst J. Meuter via Wikimedia Commons

Spring break is a one to two week academic holiday for schools and universities during March or April. The purpose of spring break is so that students can get away from school responsibilities before finals. For Highland students, our spring break started on April 6. Our spring break lasted for only a week just like most schools. But is one week really enough time for a break that is supposed to replenish students?

The period between New Year’s and April (2 & 3 quarters) is usually the hardest time (academic wise) in the school year.  Most students are overwhelmed because of the amount of work that is being thrown at them so around March and April is when academic burnout becomes more of a reality. A single week isn’t enough to actually “reset” and overcome that burnout.

Many students use spring break to travel with family and friends but 7 days is very limiting especially for those who attend school far from home.  A two-week break provides better opportunities for vacations and hangouts.

Unlike most students, teachers have a lot of grading and work to catch up on. The more grading a teacher has to do, the less time spring break can be about replenishing themselves. With a two week break, teachers would have enough time to grade, plan, and relax.

Although many people argue that more time away from school leads to “brain drain”, the opposite is true. Students are more likely to be exhausted when they come back to school after a rushed, one week break. A well rested student coming back to school from a two week break would usually be more motivated to work on final exams then a student who had only one week. The benefits of a longer Spring Break and having quality rest is something all students and teachers should experience.

Michigan vs UConn 

By: Sema’Jae Tate

The matchup between the Michigan Wolverines men’s basketball team and the UConn Huskies men’s basketball team was intense from the opening tip. Michigan came out strong, pushing the pace and knocking down early shots to build momentum. Their ball movement created open looks, allowing them to stay competitive throughout the first half. However, UConn responded with physical defense and strong rebounding, preventing Michigan from pulling too far ahead. Michigan was ahead 33-29.

In the second half, UConn began to take control of the game. Their defense tightened, forcing turnovers and limiting Michigan’s scoring opportunities. At the same time, Michigan’s offense found rhythm, converting key possessions and capitalizing on second-chance points. UConn fought hard to stay in the game, but Michigan’s consistency and late-game execution ultimately secured the win. The game showcased both teams’ strengths, but Michigan’s defense and composure proved to be the better team winning 69-63.

Another key aspect of the game between the Michigan Wolverines men’s basketball and the UConn Huskies men’s basketball was the battle of momentum. Throughout the game, both teams went on scoring runs that shifted the energy in the arena. UConn had moments where their offense clicked, hitting consecutive shots and building confidence. However, each time they gained traction, Michigan answered with a run of their own, using defensive stops and fast-break opportunities to swing the momentum back in their favor.

Personally, I feel like it was a good game all around but Michigan just came on top. Hope y’all won y’all bets. Go Michigan!