Tag Archives: movies

My top 5 best horror movies to watch

By: Arturo Benitez-Osorio

1.Incantation 

TRAILER: https://youtu.be/HnyNZdcL_GY?si=t3MJwZflZA1YzSfF

Description: Inspired by a true story of a family who believed they were possessed by spirits, this film follows a woman who must protect her child from a curse.

I remember when this movie got popular during 2024 and it caught my attention since everyone on social media were talking about how scary this movie was. I’ve checked it out and once the movie ended I felt terrified.

Things that I liked about this movie was the adrenaline rush of feeling on some scenes since you never can expect a jumpscare. There were also some few parts that made you very uncomfortable and eerie. It kept me on edge from beginning to end constantly guessing what might happen next.

If you’re looking for a deeply unsettling charged horror movie that sticks with you, I highly recommend this one since this horror movie isn’t like the rest of the others having some weak jumpscares that will actually surprise you. 

You can watch ‘Incantation’ on Netflix

2. HUSH

TRAILER: https://youtu.be/Q_P8WCbhC6s?si=KIWzZY2E-EE11Sub

Description: A deaf writer who retreated into the woods to live a solitary life must fight for her life in silence when a masked killer appears at her window.

The deaf perspective in this movie makes this movie very thrilling. It taps into the fear of being alone in a remote house realizing your safety has been completely compromised. This movie is very intense by making the protagonist deaf and forces you to rely on visual clues making every noise feel like your heart is about to drop.

This movie doesn’t use cheap jumpscares and is very unique from the rest of the movies I’m ranking. 

You can watch ‘HUSH’ on Apple TV

3. Annabelle: Creation 

TRAILER: https://youtu.be/KisPhy7T__Q?si=hIOcH1f1GQ7ATSZ6

Description: Former toy maker Sam Mullins, and his wife Esther, are happy to welcome a nun and six orphaned girls into their California farmhouse. Years earlier, the couple’s 7 year old daughter, Annabelle, died in a tragic car accident. Terror soon strikes when one child sneaks into a forbidden room and finds a seemingly innocent doll that appears to have a life of its own.

In my opinion, ‘Annabelle: Creation’ is better than the first ‘Annabelle’ (2014) as there are a lot of improvements on the atmosphere and jumpscares.

This movie uses a lot of shots where there’s a massive black space behind characters during some scenes, for example when Annabelle is trying to play “hide and seek”. It forces your eyes to focus on the background trying to search the shadow movements making you create your own scares.

It’s a fun movie to watch with a group of friends because the scares are well timed

You can watch ‘Annabelle: Creation’

4. THE NUN 2

TRAILER: https://youtu.be/U3PO4iD1G2g?si=nTPRJrYjVYJ7WXZu

Description: 1956 – France. A priest is murdered. An evil is spreading. The sequel to the worldwide smash hit ‘The Nun’ follows Sister Irene as she once again comes face to face with the demonic force Valak-The Demon Nun.

This horror movie relies on religious dread and iconography. I really don’t like religious horror movies since I feel like they’re the same like every other horror religious movie but this one was good. I watched the first horror nun movie and it really didn’t get me hyped like this one. This movie had a big improvement on the atmosphere from the first nun movie and some genuine creepy visual scenes.

This movie leans into heavy loud noises for its jump scares going from quiet to LOUD. It’s a traditional horror technique that in my opinion, doesn’t really get you into a fear state, but this horror movie had the greatest quiet to loud noises just because of the scenes they used for that technique. 

You can watch ‘THE NUN 2’ on Apple TV

5. Smile 2 

TRAILER: https://youtu.be/0HY6QFlBzUY?si=4kdqBD_ZS9b9WKAg

Description: About to embark on a new world tour, global pop sensation Skye Riley (Naomi Scott) begins experiencing increasingly terrifying and inexplicable events.

Overwhelmed by the escalating horrors and the pressures of fame, Skye is forced to face her dark past to regain control of her life before it spirals out of control.

It’s rare for a horror sequel to be better than the first one, but ‘Smile 2’ pulled it off. In ‘Smile’ the movie was about the curse and now this one focuses on the loss of reality when the “smiles” starts to happen in public places.

This movie isn’t really scary but I love how this movie adds a fear of public humiliation in front of everyone. This movie contains some of the best effects and it’s a really good movie if you’re in love with plot twists. The end will surprise you, and overall, the actress and other people are on point. 

You can watch ‘Smile 2’ on Apple TV

Top 5 Films of 2025

By: Daniel Kendle

Hey guys, it’s me: Movie Mike. If you haven’t heard of me before (chuckles), then I’d be surprised. As one of the world’s leading film critics, it’s near-impossible to encounter an aspiring reviewer in the Hollywood industry not influenced by my work. No one comes close! My opinions are sacrosanct! I wore a Criterion Collection t-shirt to my great aunt’s funeral!

Being the “movie mogul” I am, it’s safe to say that my ratings for films are all correct. This means that you simply can’t get mad at me for my opinions because, well…they aren’t! ‘Tampopo’ is overrated. ‘Bambi’ is the best Disney movie. Baz Lurhmann films all suck. These are a mere sampling of my just and truthful views, ones that – in a perfect world – would be religiously-accepted.

Anyways, that’s enough about me. 2025 was a pretty good year for movies overall, even when compared to years like 2019 and 2023. Lots of good stuff came out, so it was pretty difficult to narrow down this list to just 5. So before I begin with the countdown, let’s go over a few honorable (and dishonorable) mentions.

‘Train Dreams,’ directed by Clint Bentley, was my 6th favorite of last year. This is a lush, dreamy story about an American logger during the early 20th century, the plot paired finely with near-hypnotic cinematography. A slow film, the visuals and sound design work to captivate your interest throughout as you watch this man’s life unfold – from the beginning to the very end.

Ryan Coogler’s ‘Sinners’ also just missed out on the top 5. This was among the year’s most popular, arguably becoming the first universally-acclaimed release of 2025. I love it a lot too, though maybe a little less than others: the tone felt all over the place for me, trying to balance elements of horror, action, fantasy and even comedy genres at times, though never as gracefully as I would hope. Still very good, however.

To speed through some other films, ‘Weapons’ was one of the biggest surprises for me, especially as someone mostly-indifferent to horror flicks. I honestly foresee it potentially climbing into the top 5 with another rewatch; it gets better the more I think about it. ‘Superman’ and ‘Wake Up Dead Man’ were both extremely overrated, ‘F1’ somehow got an Oscar nom for Best Picture despite having a shallower story than ‘Cars,’ and, well…I actually did kinda like that K-Pop movie everyone’s talking about.

Alright, I think that’ll do. Without further ado, here’s my (official) list of the Top 5 Feature Films of 2025.

#5: ‘One Battle After Another’ (Paul Thomas Anderson)

Yeah, it was a shoo-in for ending up on this list, but really, why wouldn’t it? It’s safe to say that ‘One Battle After Another’ is among the premier movies of 2025, quickly becoming amongst those future cinephiles will sweat and stammer about when remembering the year’s catalog. 

Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, the film follows a group of retired mercenaries reuniting to rescue the daughter of one of their members. This is an action movie in every sense of the word, and unlike something like ‘Sinners,’ I don’t feel I have to end that statement in a question mark. The movie never lets up in its profound portrayals of family, friends and the importance of community – a notion countered by the film’s antagonist in one of Sean Penn’s best roles. Of course, Chase Infiniti, Leonardo DiCaprio and Teyana Taylor also do excellent jobs – even if I think the latter-most’s performance is a tad overrated.

While I may have it lower than others might, that’s not to diminish this film’s quality. In times of unprecedented peril and hostility around the world, it’s great to have a movie unabashedly hopeful for the future of humanity.

#4: ‘Frankenstein’ (Guillermo del Toro)

I’m a very big fan of del Toro overall, he’s easily a personal favorite director of mine. This isn’t to say he has a perfect filmography, but it’s rare for a director to have so many individually-perfect films like him. ‘Frankenstein,’ despite some minor issues, is yet another triumph from the Mexican filmmaker, feeling like the culmination of his career thus far.

Of course, the film is an adaptation of Mary Shelley’s classic novel of the same name, so I’d be wasting article space recounting the play-by-play. As it stands, however, the film is a lovely tribute to the novel, introducing new ideas whilst honoring the original’s. Oscar Issac and Jacob Elordi also do great jobs as Victor Frankenstein and The Creature respectively as well, accompanied by a talented supporting cast.

This movie pairs nicely with del Toro’s adaptation of ‘Pinocchio’ from a few years back (my personal favorite work of his), both films addressing father-son relationships, creation, and life in meaningful and touching ways. It may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but I firmly stand by ‘Frankenstein’ as being among the year’s most heartfelt flicks.

#3: ‘Bugonia’ (Yorgos Lanthimos)

‘Bugonia’ is among the films from last year I’ve thought most about since first viewing, which goes to show its staying power in the mind. What I originally perceived as a simple alien story cartwheeled into a vast sci-fi epic – one taking place entirely in a man’s basement.

The plot has a simple set-up: 2 men kidnap a CEO under the belief that she’s an alien, both seeking to save the world from her species’ wrath. The film eventually unfurls into something greater, however: a harrowing story about vengeance and what drives people to pursue it, no matter the consequences. In a collision course of a final act, ‘Bugonia’ manages to maintain both great comedy with powerful drama and cement itself as among its genre’s finest. And that score? Woof.

#2: ‘Hamnet’ (Chloé Zhao)

‘Hamnet’ is one of those films that, upon rewatch, I could see lowering my rating for and/or placement of it here, but for now I’ll just let it go. Because WOWIE, this movie is pretty dang good, actually!

An adaptation of Maggie O’Farrell’s 2020 novel, the plot predominantly follows Agnes and William Shakespeare as they grapple with the death of their 11-year-old, the titular Hamnet. The film shows their differing methods of dealing with grief, the latter using the tragedy as the basis for a new play.

The film is largely Agnes’s, however, played by Jessie Buckley in among the actress’s finest roles. I’ve been careful with my synopsis of the story to not describe her as merely “Shakespeare’s wife,” as that rids her character of so much depth on display here. Her sadness, given tangibility by the noble nature of her son’s death, is profound and moving to a fault. It’s this character and her struggle that defines the film, making it among the best of last year.

The movie isn’t perfect, but it’s crazy just how many individual things ‘Hamnet’ does do perfectly. Again, I could see myself lowering my score upon a more critical second viewing, but for now I herald it as a triumph.

#1: ‘Marty Supreme’ (Josh Safdie)

Despite claiming the top spot, I surprisingly don’t have much to say about ‘Marty Supreme’ that others haven’t already. The Safdie brothers excel in fast-paced, chaotic films that spiral out of control within minutes, given character through honest, flawed leads that add to the narrative’s energy and dynamism. ‘Uncut Gems’ has always been a great example of this trend, and ‘Marty Supreme’ looks to equal it in its levels of mania.

As to not spoil much, the film centers on the semi-fictional character of Marty Mauser, a young man who aims to be the greatest table tennis player in the world. The plot chronicles just that — for like, an hour. Interspliced with his rise to global recognition are countless vignettes showing his madcap life that quickly steal the show, turning what would be a normal sports flick into a modern epic.

I could sit here and say the filmmaking on display isn’t rocket science, but who am I kidding: it’s miraculous how what could’ve been a smorgasbord of absurd, random nosequators was instead weaved into an all-time classic. A definite highlight of 2025, and a movie I’d recommend to anyone.

The tale and tour of Annabelle

By: Jooney Freddieson & Aalovely Lor

Image created by Starryai

In paranormal history, there are many haunted objects around the world, but Annabelle the doll is the most captivating worldwide. Her legend included real-life investigations, movies, and as of recently, public appearances.

Behind the movies of Annabelle lie a backstory rooted deeply into Ed and Lorraine Warren’s paranormal research.

Ed and Lorraine have investigated over 10,000 cases of paranormal activities and originally presented their findings in Catholic schools. Ed was a self-taught demonologist and Lorraine was a medium. Together, they founded the New England Society for Psychic Research (NESPR) in 1952.

Annabelle, originally an innocent Raggedy Ann doll, was gifted to a nursing student named Donna, by her mother in the 70s. Donna and her roommate started to mess with the doll, leaving it in different positions and even making it a tradition to scare each other.

However, their fun came to an end when they began noticing strange occurrences around her living area: the doll would change positions, move to different rooms, and leave notes behind, none of which Donna or her roommate had any knowledge of causing.

Donna and her roommate concluded that it was just their vivid imagination and dismissed the occurrences but questions started to arise when the doll’s movement became more pronounced—like shifting its arm entirely or relocating more often.

Donna, believing that she was targeted by demonic forces, flew to a renowned medium. They soon discovered that the doll was inhabited by the spirit of a young girl. Donna allowed the young girl to stay and even started to treat the doll like an actual child, often buying the doll clothes, toys, jewelry, and candy.

The haunting soon turned malevolent after attacking multiple times through paralyzations and scratches appearing over the chest.

After realizing the spirit was more than just an innocent child, Donna contacted Ed and Lorraine Warren—the paranormal investigators.

The Warren’s determined that the doll was in fact taken over by a demonic entity and its goal wasn’t to haunt people but to possess a human host.

They took Annabelle to their Occult Museum in Monroe, Connecticut, preventing further harm. She was placed in a glass case with warnings not to touch, and it quickly became one of the most dangerous items in their museum.

The story of Annabelle gained popularity after its feature in ‘The Conjuring’, leading it to have its own spin-off series that begins with ‘Annabelle’.

The movie versions featured a porcelain doll, but the real Annabelle is a soft stitched Raggedy Ann. Despite the difference in visuals, the legacy remains the same.

After Lorraine’s death, the museum closed, and Annabelle remained inside. But as of 2025, Annabelle has begun going on tour as part of the traveling exhibit called “Devil’s On The Run Tour”, visiting various cities throughout the U.S.

The tour began in May and is scheduled to be on tour throughout the summer, allowing horror movie enthusiasts to meet the real Annabelle.

According to NESPR, the Annabelle tour was created in response to those with questions and in hope of funding the museum.

The tour brought concern to religious figures saying they shouldn’t treat the doll like a “novelty”, stating that it was disrespectful to provoke the doll after knowing the risks. But organizers of the tour have claimed that all participants were careful and all events were handled with caution.

This tour brought attention to social media, especially Tik Tok and Instagram. Many videos and post made about the tour gained millions of views, with people sharing everything from selfies to behind the scenes.

For more information, please visit:

Review on the movie ‘MA’

By: Sasha Deans

‘Ma’, directed by Tate Taylor and starring Octavia Spencer, is a psychological thriller that blends teenage rebellion with creeping dread in a small-town setting. At first glance, the movie seems like a typical teen drama: new girl in town trying to fit in, high school parties, and awkward crushes. But it quickly takes a sharp left turn into something much darker and more disturbing.

The story follows Maggie, a seemingly sweet and well-behaved girl who’s just moved to a small town with her single mom. She’s adjusting to a new school, new friends, and the usual teenage awkwardness. Maggie is introduced to a group of classmates who are more outgoing and party-oriented. At first, she turns down an invite to hang out, choosing to stick with her mom instead. But when her plans fall through, she decides to give it a shot and go out with them just once.

That one night quickly snowballs into something much bigger when the group crosses paths with Sue Ann, a middle-aged woman who at first seems like any other local. They meet her outside a liquor store and, after some hesitation, she agrees to buy them alcohol. What starts off as a random favor turns into an open invitation to party at her house, in the basement, to be exact. She gives them rules: stay in the basement, don’t go upstairs, and one person stays sober. At first, the teens think they’ve hit the jackpot. A cool adult who’s not only letting them drink but giving them a place to do it safely? What could go wrong?

Well, a lot, as it turns out.

One of the strongest parts of ‘Ma’ is Octavia Spencer’s performance. She’s known for playing warm, empathetic characters, so seeing her take on such a twisted and unpredictable role adds an extra layer of tension. She plays Ma with such complexity you can sense there’s pain and trauma behind her actions, but that doesn’t make her any less terrifying. She shifts between friendly and frightening so fast that you never really feel safe when she’s on screen.

Visually, the movie does a great job of creating contrast. The bright, energetic scenes of teens partying clash with the dark, confined space of Ma’s basement. The further the teens fall into Ma’s world, the more unsettling everything becomes. The film uses silence and music effectively to build suspense, and there are moments that genuinely make your skin crawl not from jump scares, but from the slow, psychological unraveling of the situation.

Personally, I found ‘Ma’ to be a unique take on the thriller genre. It’s not your typical horror movie, it’s more about mood and tension than blood and gore. It plays with your expectations, especially with how it sets up Ma as a kind, slightly awkward woman and then peels back the layers to reveal something much darker. It also makes you think about how people carry emotional scars and how dangerous it can be when those scars are left untreated.

I do agree it kinda has it’s more cheesy parts though the movie is slow and the gore/scary stuff doesn’t happen to the very very end which gets kind of annoying if your a frequent horror movie watcher.

If you’re looking for a thriller with a strong lead performance, unexpected turns, and a creepy atmosphere that sticks with you after the credits roll, ‘Ma’ is definitely worth watching. Just be warned you may never look at a friendly stranger the same way again. I rate it a 3/5

You can watch on Netflix!

Reasons why books are better than their movie adaptations

By: Fletcher Pike

Image created with ChatGPT

If you’ve ever watched a movie adaptation of a book, like ‘The Hunger Games’ or ‘Divergent’, you might wonder about the differences or similarities between the book and its movie adaptation. In this article, I will list several reasons as to why books are better than their movie counterparts.

For one, reading a book allows your mind to create your own interpretation of the story. Your brain creates your own version of the characters using descriptive words within the book that seems to make it more personal and creative. However, most movies might not correlate to your personal interpretation of what you thought characters or places looked like. This can lead to some dissatisfaction as some things might not seem as familiar to you.

Another reason is that movie adaptations usually leave out details from the book. As reading a book can usually take longer than watching a movie, the movies might leave out some interesting details or information about the plot or characters. The average film is only about 2 hours long, but books can have hundreds or even thousands of pages of descriptive words and details that can take several hours to read.

Another reason is that books help build your vocabulary. When you read a book, your brain is actively progressing in grammar and spelling. Reading several books makes you an overall smarter person as you are continuing to build your reading level and vocabulary.

Some might think that movies are more interesting than books, but books allow you to immerse yourself further into your own interpretation of the story.

Overall, I think that books are much better than movies as they provide a creative outlet for the endless stories that books contain.

‘Snow White’ controversy

By: Teagan Mack

*Note: This article contains minor spoilers

Mirror Mirror on the wall, must Disney remake them all?

Disney’s new live-action ‘Snow White’ movie has been raising a lot of debate and controversy. While some are excited to see a new take on the classic, others have some concerns about the casting choice, changes in the storyline, and overall direction the film is taking. This movie, which stars Rachel Zegler as Snow White, has sparked a vast range of opinions from critics and fans. Here’s a closer look into the major issues surrounding the movie.

The casting of Rachel Zegler as Snow White has struck significant debate, mainly because of her being a Latina actress in a role traditionally associated with fair skin and black hair. In response to the backlash, Zegler has stood by the casting, expressing that the story of Snow White is not just about appearance, but about kindness and bravery. She also pointed out that people who look like her are rarely cast in such iconic roles. In a 2022 interview with Vanity Fair, she stated, “You don’t particularly see people who look like me or are me playing roles like that,” highlighting the importance of representation in fairy-tale stories. Instead of focusing on the negative criticism, Zegler focused her attention on the significance that this role portrays for audience members who identify with her background.

This new version’s depiction of the Seven Dwarfs has also sparked debates among audiences. Peter Dinklage who advocates for dwarfism rights disagrees with Disney’s choice to feature CGI dwarves in their remake by labeling it a “backwards story”. Dinklage disagrees with this decision, and believes they should use real actors with dwarfism to play the dwarfs. The selection of a Latina actress by Disney prompted his worries about the continued existence of old stereotypes. They planned to replace them with “magical creatures” and consult the dwarfism community to prevent negative stereotypes. This decision has prompted further discussion. Some worry about losing the dwarfs’ charm and humor, while others believe it’s important to address how disabilities are represented today.

Another significant change involves Snow White’s character development. In the original animated version, Snow White is passive,  waiting for her prince. In the new version she is more active and independent. Some argue that showing women in movies as self-reliant, and strong is essential, while others feel it moves further away from the original plot of the fairy-tale.

After watching the new remake of Snow White, I’m not sure how I feel. I grew up watching all of the original Disney princess movies, and even though Snow White was not my favorite, I still found her story interesting. The movie looks good, and the costumes have a nice touch, but it doesn’t feel the same. There are no dwarfs like in the original, only magical creatures, which deviates from the old storyline. Snow White doesn’t sing “Someday My Prince Will Come,” and we don’t get to see much of the prince either. She acts more serious and tough, unlike in the original where she is kind and gentle. It feels like a completely different story with the same name. Although I liked a few parts,  I missed the songs, the animals, and the magical feeling from the original. I wish they had kept more of the Disney charm that made me love the old movies.

The controversy around the new ‘Snow White’ movie highlights the challenges Disney faces when remaking classic fairy-tales. While some appreciate the effort to make this franchise more diverse and more empowering towards women, others fear the changes could alienate fans of the traditional stories. This could include cultural aspects like ethnic representation, or sensitive portrayal in disabilities. Right now it’s unclear if this new movie will live up to the original, but its impact on bigger conversations is certain.

One person I talked to, Evelyn Lundy, summed up her thoughts about the new movie: ”The movie was revolutionary and it brought a different perspective to the story of Snow White.”

You can still see ‘Snow White’ in theaters.

JOYSTiCK Ep. 16: ‘A Minecraft Movie’ – Jock’ the Block

By: Daniel Kendle

The ‘Minecraft’ movie, formally known as ‘A Minecraft Movie’, is a 2025 film released by Warner Bros. Pictures, Legendary Pictures, and Mojang Studios. Directed by Jared Hess (‘Napoleon Dynamite,’ ‘Ninety-Five Senses’), the movie is based off of the popular video game ‘Minecraft.’ 

‘Minecraft’ is my personal favorite video game ever, so I’ve been…curious about its silver-screen adaptation ever since it was announced, boosted by its initial trailer’s release last year. I’m also (straightens tie) a bit of a film buff myself, so that helps a lot. So, on opening night of this year, I showed up to an AMC screening of the movie, clad in a suit and my dad’s sunglasses, ready to enter the pits and emerge back alive.

The film’s plot is pretty basic, all things considered; if you’ve seen the modern ‘Jumanji’ films, then you get the idea: people are sucked into a video game, and have to find their way back home to the “real” world. This comparison isn’t necessarily a bad one per say, but I think it’s the beginning of an all-encompassing problem this film has: identity.

When adapting a piece of media into a feature film, one must decide how faithful the adaptation must be. This is a sliding scale, with past video game movies falling all over the spectrum. For me, the sweet spot is around the middle: the film encapsulates and faithfully translates the source material thoroughly, but brings forth its own ideas as to not feel like just a 1-to-1 replica of its predecessor.

This is where ‘A Minecraft Movie’ confuses me. The film seems to strive to land on both opposite ends of the line: it wants to be incredibly-faithful, yet also be a standalone product. The movie features countless references and Easter eggs to ‘Minecraft’ and its spin-off franchises – hell, the main villain is a character from one of those spin-offs. And yet, seemingly to spite this, the plot chosen for the film seems barely interested in telling a story reminiscent of ‘Minecraft’s’ emotions, atmosphere, and world building, instead using locations and creatures from the game on a surface level.

Throughout the movie, I was having a good time – a GREAT time, even -, but never really processed the experience as an adaptation of the game I love. I’ve heard how people couldn’t believe that they were finally watching the ‘Minecraft’ movie upon initial viewing. While this likely isn’t their opinion on that matter, I felt the same, though in a negative way. This movie doesn’t feel reminiscent of its source material in any way other than literally. Throwing all of these references and characters is one thing, but capturing the spirit and vibe of the game you’re adapting is another.

For me, ‘Minecraft’ is a game that relies heavily on its unique atmosphere for its magic. In a vacuum, I’ve always described it as tender, yet haunting – the world, despite its scenic vistas and cute mobs, has always had a looming sense of isolation that prevents it from joining ‘Stardew Valley’ and ‘Animal Crossing’ in the cozy game genre. But then again, its loose structure separates it from a game like ‘Terraria,’ another sandbox game that employs a more strict and linear progression system.

It’s so unique, and is among the game’s most beguiling offerings.

This movie reminds me of a quote by Max Brooks, author of the book ‘World War Z’ (and, like, 3 ‘Minecraft’ novels; go figure). When asked about his thoughts on the book’s screen translation, he said:

“I was expecting to hate, it and I wanted to hate it because it was so different from my book, and yet the fact that it was so different from my book made it easier to watch because I didn’t watch my characters and my story get mangled…So I was just watching somebody else’s zombie movie, which was fun and intense.” – Max Brooks, USA Today

This quote is about how I feel about ‘A Minecraft Movie:’ it’s a fun ride and I’m able to put aside the original title and enjoy it separately, yet when compared to its adapted game in retrospect, it pales in comparison. I was able to enjoy my time in the theatre, but I’ve largely filtered out my memories with it. It’s over, and I’ve gained little in the process.

If you haven’t seen the clips online by now (a near-impossible task, I know), this film has some memes going around about it. Since the initial teaser, lines like “I…am Steve,” “Flint and steel!,” and most-popular of all, “Chicken Jockey!,” have gained immense notoriety since their inception. These are only a few of the movie’s impressive array of joke-quotes. The film rattles them out at nauseum, as if it’s a 9-5 for it. I can certainly see their appeal, and do find them funny – to an extent. Their inclusions have left me in the opinion that they make the film feel…hollow.

This movie, in my opinion, is set to become dated with time. Not because it has any specific pop culture references or whatever, but because of what it stands for. This is the ‘Minecraft’ movie. Forever. There’s no going back. And when you have a film whose main appeal is ironic, topical humor, there’s little chance that we’ll be as kind to it then as some of us are now.

There’s nothing wrong with liking ‘A Minecraft Movie,’ of course. Everyone has their own opinions, and as long as you aren’t hurting anyone else with your’s it’s perfectly-valid. But nonetheless, I’d like to see a strong argument for the film’s portrayal of this universe as one reminiscent of the power the original one holds.

Actually, there is 1 I should mention. Hess has stated in multiple interviews how the film’s title using “A” at the beginning is intentional, highlighting how this adaptation is only 1 of many, the others being fan creations and the like. Using “A” defines it as not the definitive ‘Minecraft’ translation, but only a single story in an amorphous narrative, one able to be shaped by anyone. I greatly-respect this decision, and believe it to be a strong counter to my thoughts on the movie’s tonal dissonance.

Still, I can’t call this a perfect bandage. Even if Mojang claims to view ‘A Minecraft Movie’ as only a fragment in a sea of ‘Minecraft’-related stories, its nature eludes this idea. Having the creators of the game supporting and developing this feature ultimately undermines this mentality. If the people who made the game, a movie’s adaptation, and also helped aid the movie’s development, that action leaves it impossible for the game studio to not be partial to this retelling of their original game. Their commitment to ‘A Minecraft Movie’ doesn’t cement it as the definitive adaptation of the game for all, but rather Mojang’s definitive adaptation of the game.

This partiality strains the director and companies’ efforts in underplaying the product’s pinnicality, causing the final result to attempt to stray from the original material’s theming and world as much as possible without becoming something new. And when that result personally feels like a poor representation of the material…my time with it is ruined.

. . .

This is likely my most controversial review yet, and I’m aware of that. I’ve mainly focused on the movie’s – and my – relationship with the game, which makes this review ripe with some of that yum-yum bias that politicians always drool over.

You’ve also possibly noticed how I’ve never even mentioned the story, characters, or VFX once! It’s a surface-level complaint, see – this whole time, I HAVE been talking about those, just in a manner less-literal than you may have expected. Yeah (grunts while flexing), back in elementary school, they called me Mr. Whatshisname the Foreshadow-er, for what it’s worth.

In conclusion, I’m giving ‘A Minecraft Movie’ a 4/10. As of April 2025, the film is playing in theatres globally.