Category Archives: News

The Superintendent and SPPS

On Tuesday, January 5, 2016, Jon Schumacher, Steve Marchese, Zuki Ellis, and Mary Vanderwert were sworn into Saint Paul Public Schools, (SPPS), school board.

The four new board members easily won their seats back in November with support from the St. Paul DFL Party, (Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party), and the SPPS teachers’ union. Both groups have become increasingly unhappy with Silva’s superintendent performance since she was elected in 2010.

Starting day one, the new school board majority addressed many concerns that had plagued SPPS. They demanded quick and efficient action to be taken on improving school safety and student achievement, among other goals, in a document titled “Proposed action Time-frame for 2016 SPPS Board Priorities”.

The first action expected would be to have the Superintendent publically present the proposal for the School Climate plan in February. Continuing after that, the proposal would go under revision until August. Taken aback, Superintendent Valeria Silva said, “I’m not upset about the (agenda) … but the reality is I don’t like surprises,” she said.

Silva continued to challenge the new board’s aggressive timeline of proposals on Tuesday. Silva said “Contract negotiations and mediation rules could interfere with their goals. The plans also must align with the district’s budget.”

These proposals were written by the four new board members and SPPS board veteran, John Brodrick, who has been with district since 2014.

The new board members’ number one priority on their list of proposals was to make SPPS schools more safe and welcoming to prospective, new, and current students. This is a specific point of emphasis as in the 2015-2016 school year alone, there has been at least seven reported acts of violence in SPPS schools. 

Due to the disruptions, numerous students have been suspended. It’s been reported that the district decided not to allow expulsion as of 2012, (with a few exceptions). This rule resulted in over 1,000 suspensions during the first quarter of the school year.

That means 9.22% of SPPS students were suspended the first quarter of the 2015-2016 school year. That’s the highest suspension rate in five years. In 2009, suspension rate was about 7%.

“I remain steadfast in my belief that suspensions and expulsions, while at times necessary, do little to foster a restorative culture in our schools.” – SPPS Superintendent Valeria Silva

The teachers’ union took Silva’s administration to deliberation over their next working agreement, threatening to strike if they don’t get their way on school climate and safety. Their demands included a $100,00 budget to focus on school climate and safety. Silva commented the plan would cost up to $11 million a year. It’s been reported she has created a new department of administration that would exclusively address school climate. She explained she hopes the department will spend the next year researching possible situations.

“Kids are feeling really unsafe and are not feeling at ease at school anymore,” says a Highland Park Junior.

Parents, students and teachers alike are becoming frustrated with our Superintendent. Parents like Doug Hartmann, a Como father, told Pioneer Press, “I’ve been frustrated as a parent. I’m not convinced the superintendent is doing enough to take it seriously.”

A leader who doesn’t “like surprises” or insists on spending valuable time on making color-coded presentation boards rather than solving the problems of SPPS.

“I don’t know what we can do to solve it,”-Superintendent Valeria Silva

It being the violence in our schools, the drop in testing scores, and the students falling behind because she is not willing to accept suggestions to counteract these problems.

Hopefully, the school board will be able to address the serious issues facing SPPS, and in the future, Superintendent Silva will be able to come to a place of understanding that will allow her to work in conjunction with the board.

Black Lives Matter protests

15 people were arrested after protests from the Black Lives Matter activist group took place at the Mall of America and the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.  This came at a time in which both sites were experiencing their highest amount of traffic throughout the year.

Prior to the protests, the Mall of America filed a restraining order on Black Lives Matter, in an attempt to try and avoid what occurred at the mall in December 2015, when a massive demonstration ended up disrupting businesses and shut down stores. Hennepin County District Court Judge Karen Janisch ruled that organizers of the group would not be allowed to protest at the mall, but said that she could not stop other members of the group from attending the protest.

She wrote: “The Court does not have a sufficient basis to issue an injunction as to Black Lives Matters or to unidentified persons who may be acting as its agents or in active concert with the Black Lives Matters movement.”

In anticipation for the protests, some stores around the central rotunda closed, and barricades with heavily increased security we set up around the mall. As protesters started to gather, the mall made announcements that the demonstration was unlawful, and asked the activists to leave mall property.

The protest inside the mall was stopped, and a large majority of the group began marching down to the nearby light rail station, as well as the airport. Protestors began to block major roadways to the airport and gathered inside Terminal 1 which caused security checkpoints to close inside the airport. This caused many travel headaches for people traveling during the busy holiday season

All of this stems from recent racial injustices taking place throughout the nation, and more specifically sought to bring attention to the recent shooting of an unarmed African American man in Minneapolis, Jamar Clark.

Your favorite mall just got bigger

If you have been to the Mall of America recently, you may have noticed the large extension to the mall that just opened right before the rush of the holiday season.

Even before any of the physical additions had been added on, the mall changed their logo in 2013 to start the process of creating a new image.

The mall has also undergone physical renovations to the inside of the main original mall. They started to replace the old dated brown and yellow flooring and uncomfortable benches throughout the mall and put in new modern white flooring and new sitting options. These renovations to the original mall are still happening and will continue until they have completed the modernization phase.

The new additions include a completely new north grand entrance and offers a new modern walkway into the mall. It also includes a JW Marriott and a medium size multipurpose building that they have said will be used for office space, more nightlife and entertainment options and smaller boutique style retail.

The north food court was also revamped and has many new high end food chain restaurants along with a few cheap fast food restaurants, the new higher end restaurants are opening in the near future.

The owners of the Mall Of America (Triple Five Group) have also submitted plans to expand the mall even more in phases. They plan on having the next phase open by October of 2018 and this will include high end retail, a hotel, more parking and much more. By the end of all of these additions, the mall will comprise of 8.8 million square feet.

Gun violence

In the United States there have been many cases of violence, specifically gun violence, including mass shootings. Statistics from articles on The Brady Campaign website state that in the United States, just in a year, an average of 108,000 people in America are shot in murders, assaults, suicides/suicide attempts, unintentional shootings, or by police intervention. According to the website Heeding God’s Call, the U.S. has more gun homicides annually, 10,000, than any other country.

The debate over gun control in the U.S. has been stirred up over the recent mass killings. What is gun control? Gun control is the government regulation of the manufacture, sale, and possession of fire arms.

Even with all the shootings in the U.S., many people are against gun control. According to Smartgunlaws.org people claim “that they need guns for protection or for their safety.”

Opponents of gun control laws argue that Americans have the right to bear arms. They say that gun control laws would prevent individuals from defending themselves and their property lawfully. They also support the rights of hunters, sport shooters, and recreational gunmen. One of the most common laws that these groups cite is the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This 27-word passage has the famous phrase “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The argument that gun control opponents make is that the right to own and use weapons is an undeniable personal freedom guaranteed by the Constitution.

Proponents of gun control believe that stronger gun laws can prevent the needless loss of life. Even individuals who support gun rights acknowledge that certain people should not be permitted to own guns. Current gun control laws prevent criminals, mentally ill individuals, and children from owning guns.

Unfortunately, there have been instances where young people and deranged gunmen have obtained weapons and used them to commit mass murders. Also, others argue that there are too many criminals that can still purchase a gun legally and then go and commit crimes.

Even though thee controversy of gun control has become a big issue recently, there will always be a debate regarding the issue of having guns, until they make laws that most people will agree on. This is something that will be very difficult to do however, since everyone will always have an opinion on whether they believe people should or shouldn’t be able to have guns.

I think gun control should be more heavily enforced, as more guns fall into the hands of the wrong people. I feel as though there is no need to carry an armed weapon, and there is just too much violence with guns. I also feel as though people don’t really use guns for protection purposes, instead they simply have them so that they can feel more powerful, and this is not a good reason as to why people should have guns. These are some of the reasons why I think gun control laws should be enforced more.

SPPS fights

This past school year has seen an increase in fights in the St. Paul Public School district. Harding High School, Como Senior High, and Central all have had to call police over the recent fights that have been happening, according to Fox News. In the beginning of the school year, a loaded gun was brought to Harding in a backpack along with marijuana. According to Fox 9 news, there was no intent on using the gun.

After the Central High student (name not released) attacked staff member Mr. Ekbald during lunch, the mother of the student said that her child did not know the adult was a teacher. The 16 year old student caused a traumatic brain injury, tingling in his hands and back, and neck pain to the staff member. Mr. Ekbald was choked until he was left unconsciousness and later was admitted to a hospital.

School officials are saying the outbreak of violence in SPPS schools are a result of poverty and lack of parental guidance. In an interview with Fox 9 News, the principal of Central High, Mary Mackbee, spoke about the outbreak of violence, “Our kids are needier they come from families that are suffering, whether financially or for other reasons. There’s just a lot of chaos in this world.”

One of the problems may be discipline. The Pioneer Press reports that many students are disrespectful towards their teachers. That behavior may lead to more violent behavior.

This issue hits Highland Park Senior High hard, because we’re part of the SPPS schools, and we care about our students’ safety. Kennedy McTeague, a ninth grader at Highland, when asked about her safety in school replied, “I feel terrible about what happened at Central, but I don’t think that’ll happen at Highland. We hardly have any fights and we are given alternative ways to deal without violent breakouts.”

Medical marijuana

Marijuana has created quite the controversy throughout the United States recently, with protests for and against the legalization of “weed”, the terrifying statistics of imprisoned people due to possession of the plant, and the ever growing recreational usage among young people. The use and possession of this narcotic is illegal in 48% of the United States, but it has been decriminalized in four states. The plant has also been legalized in many states for recreational, as well as medicinal, use. Minnesota is one of the states to recently legalize marijuana for medicinal use.

Minnesota’s strict policies are being re-visioned in hopes of being less
restrictive. During the last half of 2015, the medical marijuana bill went under slight revision. One provision requires the health department to consider adding severe pain as a qualifying condition by January 2016 instead of July 2016, which is when the law originally suggested. Though individuals with severe chronic pain can’t access the the medical marijuana immediately, they can access it six months earlier than before.

Rapid implementation of a medical marijuana program has been underway in Minnesota. In July of 2015, the program opened their first patient registry. Due to the revision, patients suffering from cancer, HIV/AIDS, glaucoma, ferreted syndrome, ALS, and more may have access to medical marijuana with an annual payment of $200.

There are now several locations for medical marijuana dispensaries supporting patients in pain. Dispensaries can be found throughout Minnesota including cities such as: Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids, Duluth, Eagan, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, Plymouth, Rochester, St. Cloud, St. Paul, and Woodbury.

Are Muslims what the media says they are? No.

Are Muslims what the media say they are?

Not all Muslims are terrorist.

There are people that claim to be Muslims but don’t act like one, like ISIS groups who kill anyone in their way.

There are Muslims that just want peace but are getting blamed for other people’s actions.

In Islam we are taught not kill a little spider. We are taught to let be it free. We are forbidden to shed blood.  A verse from the Qur’an says, “…take not life, which God hath made sacred, except by way of justice and law: thus doth He command you, that ye may learn wisdom.” Life is sacred in Islam.

Certain people just don’t understand that terrorist don’t just attack non- Muslim areas. How many attacks have happened, and are still happening, in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other Islamic regions?

Not all extremists are Muslims like the media makes them out to be. The media can be better about how they refer to terrorist groups because other Muslims don’t need to be blamed for what a group of people in their religion does. These groups claim to be Muslims but they give themselves specific names, so why not call them by what they want to be called, i.e. ISIS, Al Qaeda, etc?

A religion shouldn’t be blamed for what some people who practice it do. Innocent Muslims don’t want to feel targeted for something they have nothing to do with.

The Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has proposed that Muslims should be banned from entering the United States. Donald Trump has had many interviews and does not seem to be having any second thoughts about his proposal. Donald Trump might want this proposal to secure our country, but he is also punishing innocent people. He is taking away the opportunities and dreams of those that didn’t do anything wrong aside from believing in a specific religion.

So are Muslims what the media say they are?

No, because the negative actions of Muslims, through groups like ISIS, do not reflect the average Muslim.

E. Coli outbreak

News is spreading about Chipotle’s new health situation. The popular food chain Chipotle Mexican Grill has recently been linked to reported cases of E. Coli (Escherichia Coli). E. Coli is a bacteria that generally lives in the lower intestines of humans and animals and is not harmful. However, some strains of E. Coli, in this case Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O26 A.K.A. “STEC 026”, can cause an intestinal infection. Symptoms of an intestinal infection include diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain. More severe cases have had reported symptoms such as bloody diarrhea, dehydration and sometimes kidney failure. Younger children, older adults, and pregnant women have increased risks of developing complications. E. Coli can be caused by improperly treated food or water, however properly treating food and water, along with good hygiene immensely decrease the risks of getting an intestinal infection.

So far there have been 52 reported cases of E Coli linked to Chipotle. These 52 reported cases are spread out over 9 states. 1 person reported having been infected by STEC 026 in Illinois, Maryland, New York, and Pennsylvania. There have been 2 reported cases in Minnesota. California and Ohio both experienced 3 reported cases. In Oregon there have been 13 reported cases. Washington has had the most reported cases with 26. Out of the 52 reported cases there have been zero deaths, however, 20 of the reported cases had to be hospitalized.

47 (90%) of the overall 52 cases, reported to have eaten at Chipotle within a week before they fell ill. Chipotle is working with public health officials to understand the distribution of the food items served at the locations where individuals who contracted STEC 026 ate.

For more information, please go to: http://www.CDC.gov

Questioning SROs’ role in SPPS

In a recent Pioneer Press article, it was stated that chair of Saint Paul Public School Board, Mary Doran had proposed the idea to remove student resource officers from all Saint Paul Public Schools. This proposal created controversy, especially in light of the recent events around SPPS. Just within the past 4 months of the 2015-16 school year, SPPS has faced many dangerous incidents. This includes;

  • A loaded handgun found at Harding High School
  • An officer punched in the face breaking up a fight at Harding High School
  • An outbreak of fights with 10+ students involved at Como Park High School
  • A student at Central High School tasered for refusing to leave class
  • And the most recent event, a staff member hospitalized after trying to break up a fight at Central High School

With the occurrence of these events, many people believe that removing all student resource officers (SROs) would only make schools a more dangerous place to learn. The SRO budget is currently $854,000 to pay for nine resource officers within the district. This money is from the school district budget provided by education funding from the government. Although removing these officers would save money and help with budget cuts, many people believe that their presence within the schools is essential. The removal could elevate the situation and make our schools more dangerous without strong reinforcement present at all times.

One reason Ms. Doran supposedly questioned the presence of SROs in our schools is because earlier this year, an officer at Spring Valley High in South Carolina assaulted a student. Since then there has been much talk about the benefits and disadvantages SROs bring to schools around America.

After contacting Ms. Doran, she claims that the reporter simply misinterpreted her proposal, and that she just meant to start a conversation between students about their opinions of their school officers. She also claims that she does not wish to remove all SROs, and in fact she firmly believes their presence in schools is much needed in light of these recent events.

In the Pioneer Press article, the reporter said, “Evidently, you have some doubts as to whether SROs are a strictly positive presence in St. Paul schools“, but Mrs. Doran claims that nothing she said lead to that conclusion. She also claims these were false assumptions with no evidence. In summary, she believes that officers are important for the safety of students and teachers within the school, and they will not be removed.

Banning of books

A committee consisting of parents and staff members in the Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan district voted to keep the book Just One Day on the shelves of school libraries. The book is centered around a young female character named Allyson and her plans to travel Europe following her graduation. She then meets a young man during her trip, which leads to “ a day of risk and romance, and 24 hours that will transform Allyson’s life.”

The content of the book was brought into question after an 11-year-old girl checked the book out from the Rosemount Middle School library. The girl’s parents did not agree with the substance of the book, as it contains some areas with crude language and adult sexual content.

This decision raises questions about what kinds of books should be put into school libraries, and determining whether or not these books are “appropriate” for young people to read. Does there need to be some kind of rating system for literature like there is for movies? Or should we leave it up to the parents to determine what their children should be reading?

From my own experiences in high school, it was inevitable that I would run into a piece of literature that contained adult themes, especially in the IB program. So, shielding young readers from these types of  books can potentially hurt their preparation for further reading as well as limit their knowledge and understanding of the things that go on in the world around them. Who’s to say that these kids won’t be more compelled to get their hands on a book once it gets banned? Ultimately, parents should have confidence and trust in their children to determine what reading material is appropriate for them.