By: Lila Dingmann, Serafina Zambreno, and Erin Moore

Over one lifetime, the gender wage gap adds up to $500,000. If women were paid as much as men, the female poverty rate would be cut in half. There is a 44% income gap between senior men and women. However, the wage gap is still denied by a large portion of the world.

Women experience sexism in a variety of forms in their daily lives, yet because they don’t see, understand, or relate to it, many men deny its presence. The gender wage gap is believed to be made up by roughly 50% of men according to an online poll of nearly nine thousand people.

However, it is undeniably true that women make $0.82 for every $1 a man makes and women of color only make $0.79 on that same dollar. This already sets women at a financial disadvantage, but on top of that is something even lesser known than the gender wage gap: the pink tax.

The average price on feminine products is higher in comparison to their masculine counterparts. This includes the unnecessarily expensive prices on period products, birth control, feminine hygiene products, and most items targeted toward women. Products are indirectly made for women when they are decorated with glitter, pastels, flowers, or the color pink–hence the name, “the pink tax.”

In 2010, consumer reports showed that women may pay up to 50% more than men for identical products. Women pay $1,351 more per year because of pricing, which becomes around $2,300 when adjusted for modern inflation, according to a California study in 1994. A study by the New York Department of Consumer Affairs in 2015 found that women’s products had a higher price tag 42% of the time, over double the 18% of the time that men’s products were more expensive.

Companies try to explain this increase away by the fact that women’s products are more expensive to manufacture, however, in many cases, the only difference is the item’s color.

Feminine products are priced 7% higher on average than their masculine equivalents (the smallest difference being 4% found between children’s clothing and the largest being 13% found between hygiene products). Examples of this include the following: BIC “for her” pens were double the price of a gender-neutral pack of pens, a pink wireless mouse was 39% more expensive than an identical blue mouse, a women’s pack of razors was 51% more expensive than the same men’s pack of razors, and a feminine train set costed 11% more.

Services, such as haircuts and dry cleaning also show very similar results: unequal prices.

In addition to being paid less than men, women also must spend more for the same products. This is only a small portion of the daily effects that sexist ideologies have on our everyday lives.

Some companies have recently begun making efforts to end the pink tax, which proves with enough unity and work, we can make a difference. CVS, as of February 2023, reduced the price on period products and decided to cover the sales tax for feminine products in twelve states.

This article was written to spread awareness about the pink tax, as it’s a very prominent financial issue for women, but not enough people know it exists. To combat the pink tax, you can purchase the cheapest versions of feminine products, buy masculine products instead, or speak up when you notice gender-based pricing in a store to leaders and other people in power.

For more information, please visit:

• https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/8a42df04-8b6d-4949-b20b-6f40a326db9e/the-pink-tax—how-gender-based-pricing-hurts-women-s-buying-power.pdf https://time.com/5562171/pay-gap-survey-equal-pay-day/
• https://money.usnews.com/money/personal-finance/taxes/articles/the-pink-tax-costs-women-thousands-of-dollars-over-their-lifetimes

By: Daniel Kendle

If you go up to any random Joe on the street, chances are that they’ll know what a bear is. If you don’t then you’re honestly kind of weird, in my opinion. But for the 1% who’re in the dark, it’s my duty as “Bear Ambassador” of this school to provide an up-to-date list of every species of bear, ordered from worst to best. Because who wouldn’t run out of article ideas after 3 weeks?

This article has a very simple structure: I will be listing bears from worst to best, giving reasons towards their placement and what they could “do better,” so-to-say. I don’t think we’ll be here for long, but I’ll try to be intricate-yet-short in why each species of bear is where it is. Bears are no-nonsense animals; you won’t find a bear wanting to have small talk all of the time, unless you’re a cartoon bear from Europe or whatever.

Whether you’re a Pooh defender or pro-Paddington, all can agree that fictional bear characters in media aren’t actual species, and will not be on this list. I mean, you’ve got bears ranging from books like ‘The Jungle Book’ to TV shows like ‘Gentle Ben,’ and I frankly don’t have the time to talk about everything. Screw you Pooh, I do what I WANT.

Clearly I’m stalling for time, so with the basics out of the way, let this list commence! Here’s every big species of bear ranked, brought to you by Highland’s resident bear ambassador.

Number 8: Sloth Bear

If your favorite species of bear is the sloth bear, you’re WEIRD. Like, maybe you’re in support of the underdog team in sports movies and you just feel bad for it, but who in this astral plane of reality likes sloth bears. Like…there are other bears, guys! At this point I’d rather have someone come up to me and say that their favorite bear is the ‘Paddington’ bear (or spit in my face, sure).

Sloth bears, endemic to India and the areas surrounding it, are one of a few species of bears that are facing extinction. They’re generally more passive than other species of bears, with their diet being focused on insects rather than carrion. This would be fine under normal circumstances, but since the species exists in the same habitat as much cooler animals such as tigers and cobras, seeing a raggedy-looking bear skulking around the woods isn’t that cool.

Number 7: Asiatic Black Bear

This is the shortest “beareview” due to the fact that sloth bears and asiatic black bears are essentially the same bear, with their biggest difference being that the latter’s name is significantly-cooler than the former’s. Besides that difference (and the only reason one is over the other) the bears are essentially the same, just with some geographical differences.

If I researched the species further I’d probably come across ground-breaking information about the density of their toenails and stuff that zoologists ogle over, but time is time, and as such will continue without letting me stop to look into these topics. Speaking of which, let’s move on, too!

Number 6: Giant Panda

Since this pick is so low, this is probably the most controversial choice throughout this list. But here be the gods’ gospel as I, a lowly sophomore, proclaim that giant pandas are pretty alright, really.

First, to get this out of the way, we’ve got to address their name. With a couple of exceptions, giant pandas suffer the worst from something I call “the blunt naming problem.” To summarize, a problem with a lot of animals’ names is that they’re usually named after either very obvious or convoluted reasons, with there being a lack of middle ground. For example, spectacled bears have very strange names, likely from their eye patches kind of-resembling glasses, while giant pandas have such simple names that it becomes somewhat farcical.

The only reason they’re known as “giant” – in my opinion – is because the people who dubbed them needed to differentiate them from the smaller, cuter red pandas. But why the word “giant” comes to mind is strange to me, since giant pandas aren’t very big compared to other bears. They’re pretty small, actually.

But maybe what makes them truly giant is the ridiculous amount of attention given to them around the globe. Along with being China’s national animal, they’ve infested pop culture with their image, being a part of toys, games, a multi-billion dollar animated movie franchise, the like. The only reason I’m harping on this point about consumerism is because they were even added to ‘Minecraft,’ which I hope conveys the reach this stupid species of bears have had. When it comes to that game, it and I have a relationship like a moth to a flame, but nonetheless the only reason I’d mention it in an article about bears is if it somehow boosted my point about pandas having a chokehold on the metaphorical neck of the world. And today that oddly-specific scenario comes true, hooray!

Pandas, as animals, are just kind of okay. Like, they’re cute, but if someone goes around talking about how pandas could deck any other animal on earth, then maybe it’s time someone decks them. Pandas are cute, but they’re the cotton candy of bears. Cuddly, fluffy mammals that just can’t compare to the battle-ready, still-somewhat-cute competition further along this list. Just search up “fierce panda,” like I did while writing this. Most pictures you’ll find are art or logos of panda bears, not the actual species itself. That’s a good way to look at giant pandas, actually: they’re cute, but more of a species for people to gawk at, rather than being a defining species of bear.

Number 5: Spectacled Bears

These are probably the least-known species of the “big bears.” It could be that it’s the only bear on this list in South America, a continent not known for their bears, or maybe the species is very reclusive, very shy from photographers and researchers. Or it could possibly be because they’re really darn uninteresting.

That being said, compared to giant pandas, these fellas are uninteresting not because of their overexposure in the media, or them being too soft and weak to do much of anything, but mostly just because of their lack of attention. As far as bears go, these guys are pretty cool, but due to no one really giving them the light of day I can’t place them much higher than the 5th spot.

To find the best bear, we need to examine bears both as species and in society. Giant pandas are fine, but their monopolization of the world makes them an over-saturated animal to many. Spectacled bears have the opposite issue, for they’re just too obscure for their own good. Not bad by any means, but they just don’t fit the criteria I’ve set out.

Number 4; Sun Bears

Some (few) may be wondering why sun bears managed to claim one of the top spots. It’s simple – while not the “coolest” or “fiercest” bears out there, they manage to fit the standards for what it means to be a good bear.

Sun bears are the last bears on this list that are native to Asia, and they’re probably the most unique bear here, for a couple of reasons. Their tongues are super long, giving them an insect-based diet. They also have a sun-shaped pattern on their chest, hence the name. These features give them a very goofy appearance.

These attributes raise the question: why does this bear top others here? I don’t know, honestly, other than that, while very different from other bears, it still manages to fill the bear quota, in addition to having its own identity.

Number 3: Grizzly Bears

…or “brown bears” as some call them, are probably seen by the public as the “basic bear,” the bear that many can point to when asked to draw one. Their image is recognizably-simple: a large, rotund, furry mammal with sharp claws and brown, shaggy hairs.

In some ways this makes them a tad boring; all of the other bears on this list have some kind of unique attribute that makes them special. Other than being walking tanks in combat, these bears are simple, yeah. Nonetheless their popularity in being such a basic design has proven the naysayers wrong. I’m on the side of those who think that they’re cool. Like, grizzly bears can’t juggle or dance or whatnot, but they get the job done at the end of the day. That job, of course, filling out bear criteria.

In the picture for this article they’re depicted as #1, and while they’re only the bronze medal in this race, they’re the definitive bear for a lot of people, since their identity is that of just being a bear. Others like pandas and polar bears are characterized by superficial means, like their habitats and fur color. But when you have a bear whose existence is to act as the base-form bear, that’s a good bear in my opinion because it’s the most bear-like bear!

Number 2: Polar Bears

While I like grizzly bears because of their simplicity, I’ve always thought of polar bears as an upgraded version of the former. Everything about them can be seen as analogous to grizzly bears, yet done better. They’re bigger, stronger, live in a unique habitat, and are the largest land carnivores in the world.

The only real downside is that they’re dying out because of global warming, but then again, I have a “survival of the fittest” mentality in life, so it doesn’t faze me very much [this is a joke]. Other than being weaklings against some hot air they’re pretty cool animals, actually. There’s not that much to talk about them, since polar bears are just neat, and I like them. But they’re not the best bear.

Number 1: Black Bears

So, after careful analysis and tedious studies, we (I) can confidently say that, yes, black bears are the best bears, for a simple reason: they have all of the best attributes of the past 3 bears.

They have the icon status of polar bears, the wide-spread range of grizzlies and the uniqueness of sun bears. They’re cute and small-enough for merchandising in the public eye, but not overblown like panda bears are. They have a varied diet and can live in many different environments (something that polar bears can’t do) and don’t look hideous (like sloth bears and their asiatic cousins). This goes to show that, while unique, black bears have all of the best traits of bears.

They are the perfect species here, and are the definitive bear due to straddling both common and rare traits, making for an accessible animal for people to connect to. So yes, in this year’s ‘2024 Bearlympics,’ the judges have tallied that the humble black bear has emerged victorious and is, with every option considered, the single best bear.

By: Jocelyn Knorr

Valentine’s Day coincided with another very important date this year, but the leadup to the Super Bowl wasn’t all excitement. Instead, there was a very odd undertone to the festivity as people on social media pushed one of the oddest conspiracy theories to ever cross the internet.

Speculation surrounding the billion-dollar pop star Taylor Swift is nothing new—I still have distinct memories of the week everyone went crazy over the theory that she and Formula One driver Fernando Alonso were dating—but this has been taken to a new level by proponents of the “rigged Super Bowl” theory. It’s based off of two things. 1) Taylor Swift has a very large audience. When she called on her fans to register to vote in an Instagram post, vote.org, the website she directed them to recorded a 1,226% jump in registration. 2) Since December of 2023, Swift has been publicly dating Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce. Since then, she has been spotted at many of his games to cheer him on.

This is where we get into corkboard-covered-in-red-string territory. Because of the link between Swift and Kelce, former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy suggested on Twitter that the Super Bowl was going to be rigged in the Chiefs’ favor. This ensuing attention would facilitate Swift throwing her support behind sitting president Joe Biden, who is up for re-election in 2024. In Ramaswamy’s theory, Swift’s legion of fans would heed her call, and vote for Biden in the next election. Ramaswamy himself has a sizable audience; people began to regurgitate this story across platforms, leading to a significant subset of the American population that legitimately believes in a rigged Super Bowl.

Biden has responded to these accusations by making jokes on TikTok and releasing merch that depicts himself with glowing red eyes. Specifically, he calls this alter ego “Dark Brandon;” a reference to Let’s Go Brandon, a euphemism for “F***Joe Biden.” He’s been using this alter ego to poke fun at the people who believe these theories, most notably by posting “just like we drew it up” as Dark Brandon on Twitter after the Chiefs win.

It may seem all in good fun, but one has to remember that humans are prideful animals. When someone makes fun of us, we tend to discount them out of hand—sour grapes, and all that. This is a largely polarized conspiracy, spreading mostly through the far- and alt-right and even several sitting members of the government. When the leader of the Democratic Party decides he’s going to make fun of these people on a major public platform, he pushes them further away. It jeopardizes our already-imperiled ability to work across the aisle. I’m not saying that we have to agree with the things these people say, but we do need to remember that there are people on the other side of the screen. If we choose to engage, we should do it kindly. It’s like having a coworker who sucks; vent away in private, but don’t humiliate them on Twitter.